Sycamore Scholars

Comparing the Perceived Relevance of Informal and Formal Learning in Skill Acquisition in a Leadership Development Program

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Smith, William Kirk
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-06T12:43:55Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-06T12:43:55Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10484/8247
dc.description.abstract Leadership development is at or near the top in importance to senior executives within organizations. In the criteria for the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award, leadership has the second highest weighting, behind only business results but ahead of customer focus, measurement, analysis, knowledge management, workforce focus, process management, and strategic planning. Corporations in the United States spend an estimated $20-30 billion per year in leadership training and there is a question of whether the learning that takes place outside the classroom, informal learning, is more relevant than formal learning. Learning within organizations is vital to success. It is the lifeblood that grows and sustains human capital. Many methods for the measurement and evaluation of the impact of formal learning and performance improvement programs in organizations have been introduced in the past decade but measuring and evaluating the value of informal learning that filters through patterns of relationships in organizational networks has been elusive. Very few studies have attempted to address the effects of informal and formal learning in management or leadership training. The objective of this study was to compare the perceived relevance of informal learning and formal learning in acquiring leadership skills in a leadership development program. This study attempted to compare the perceived relevance of informal learning versus formal learning in skill acquisition in a specific leadership development program. This was done using data from McKesson Corporation‘s McKesson Center for Learning Lead the Way program. This study provides insights into the perceived relative importance and relevance of informal and formal learning. Using paired-samples t-tests, the study analyzed the perceived relevance and importance in a leadership development program.
dc.description.statementofresponsibility William Kirk Smith
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Non-formal education.
dc.subject.lcsh Human resource development.
dc.subject.lcsh Complex adaptive systems.
dc.subject.lcsh Leadership--Evaluation.
dc.subject.lcsh Leadership--Study and teaching.
dc.subject.other Informal learning.
dc.title Comparing the Perceived Relevance of Informal and Formal Learning in Skill Acquisition in a Leadership Development Program
dc.type Dissertation
dc.date.graduationmonth December
dc.date.published 2010
dc.description.committeechair Maughan, George
dc.description.committeemembers David Beach
dc.description.committeemembers Tad Foster
dc.description.degree Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.department Department of Technology Management
dc.description.imprint Cunningham Memorial library, Terre Haute,Indiana State University
dc.description.itemidetd 201005-11
dc.description.level Doctoral
dc.description.note Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages: contains 112p.: ill. Includes bibliography, abstract and appendix.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Scholars


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account